QuickStats: Percentage of Adults Who Received Any Mental Health Treatment in the Past 12 Months, by Age Group and Year — National Health Interview Survey, United States, 2019–2020

October 29, 2021

The percentage of adults who had received any mental health treatment in the past 12 months increased from 2019 to 2020 overall (19.2% to 20.3%) and among adults aged 18–44 years (18.5% to 20.9%).

In 2019, the percentage of adults who had received any mental health treatment in the past 12 months was lower among those aged 18–44 years (18.5%) compared with those aged 45–64 years (20.2%) and 65 years or older (19.4%).

In 2020, the percentage decreased with age, from 20.9% among adults aged 18–44 years to 18.7% among those aged 65 years or older.

Sources: National Center for Health Statistics. NCHS data brief, no. 380. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db380-H.pdf; NCHS data brief, no. 419. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db419.pdf

Q & A with Author: Rural-urban Differences in Unintentional Injury Death Rates Among Children Aged 0-17: United States, 2018-2019

October 27, 2021

DB421_fig1Questions for Matthew Garnett, Health Statistician and Lead Author of “Rural-urban Differences in Unintentional Injury Death Rates Among Children Aged 0-17: United States, 2018-2019.”

Q: Can you describe what unintentional injury deaths are?

MG: Unintentional injury deaths include fatal injuries that were unintended, unplanned, and did not occur on purpose. In contrast, intentional injuries include homicide or assault and suicide or self-harm. Unintentional injury deaths include a wide array of mechanisms, with the four most common being: poisoning, motor vehicle crashes, drowning, and falls.

Q: How did the data vary by age groups?

MG: Rates of unintentional injury deaths differ across age groups. In both urban and rural areas, unintentional injury death rates were highest among children aged under 1 year, followed by a decline in the 1–4 and 5–13 age groups, and then increasing in the 14–17 group. Although this pattern was seen in both urban and rural areas, rural rates were consistently higher than urban rates for all age groups.

The high rates experienced among children under the age of 1 year were driven by high rates of suffocation (includes choking, asphyxiation, and strangulation). Among children aged 1-4 years, the leading mechanisms diverged based on urban-rural status, with drowning being the leading mechanism in urban areas, and with both drowning and motor vehicle traffic being the leading mechanism among in rural areas. In the older age groups, including those aged 5-13 and 14-17, motor vehicle traffic was the leading mechanism.

The decrease in overall rates from the under 1 year group to the 1-4 age group can be explained by a lower suffocation rates, which decreased from 24.9 in urban areas and 42.1 in rural areas among children under 1, to 0.7 and 1.1, respectively, in the 1-4 age group. The increase in overall rates between the 5-13 and 14-17 age groups is partially due to the increase in motor vehicle traffic rates, which increased from 1.5 in urban areas and 3.1 in rural areas among the 3-13 age group to 5.1 and 12.5, respectively, in the 14-17 age group.

Q: Do you have trend data that goes further back than 2018?

MG: This information is not presented in the report, but additional national data is available through CDC’s query system – CDC WONDER. Since 1999, rates of unintentional injury death among children aged 0-17 years have decreased from a high of 12.7 (per 100,000 population) in 1999 to 7.2 in 2019, a 43% decrease. Decreases were seen both in urban and rural areas. In urban areas the rate decreased from 11.0 in 1999 to 6.4 in 2019, a 42% decrease. In rural areas, the rate decreased from 21.5 in 1999 to 12.7 in 2019, a decrease of 41%. The unintentional injury death rate has decreased among children in both areas between 1999 and 2019; however, the gap between urban and rural rates has been maintained over time.

Rates of Unintentional Injury Death Among Children Aged 0-17 Years by Urban-rural Status, United States, 1999-2019



Rate per 100,000


Rate per 100,000


Rate per 100,000





















































































NOTES: Unintentional injury deaths are identified using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision underlying cause-of-death codes V01–X59 or Y85–Y86. The decedent’s county of residence was classified as urban or rural based on the 2013 NCHS Urban–Rural Classification Scheme for Counties. Rates shown are crude rates (deaths per 100,000).

SOURCE: National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System, Mortality.

Q: What is the main takeaway message here?

MG: There are two main takeaways here. The first is that when discussing unintentional injury deaths, there are disparities for children between urban and rural areas. These disparities are found across age groups, and across multiple injury mechanisms.

The second takeaway is that the reasons for unintentional injury deaths change with age. Among the youngest children, under 1 year of age, suffocation is the leading mechanism of death, with the highest rate of any mechanism for both urban and rural children across all age groups. Among slightly older children aged 1-4 years, the leading mechanism becomes motor vehicle traffic and drowning. After this age group, the mechanism with the highest rates is motor vehicle traffic for children aged 5-13 and 14-17. For all of these leading mechanisms, rates were higher for children in rural areas.

Q: What are the reasons why unintentional injury death rates are higher in rural vs. urban areas?

MG: Data from this report suggests that different mechanisms drive the overall unintentional injury rate for each age group. Urban-rural disparities between mechanisms provide insight into the larger disparities seen in the overall unintentional rates. For example, among children under the age of 1, the rural rate of deaths involving suffocation were significantly higher (42.1 per 100,000 population) than urban rates (24.9). For that age group, suffocation was a major driver of disparity seen in the total unintentional injury death rate, which was 48.8 for rural areas and 29.3 for urban areas.

Among children aged 1-4, all reportable mechanisms show significantly higher rates among children in rural areas compared to children in urban areas. For some mechanisms, these disparities are smaller, such as natural or environmental deaths where the rural rate was 0.5 compared to the urban rate of 0.3. In other mechanisms the disparity is larger, such as for deaths involving fire or flames, where the rural rate was 1.7 compared to the urban rate of 0.4, more than 4 times higher.  

Among children aged 5-13 and 14-17, not all mechanisms show a significant disparity. However, some of the largest drivers of the overall unintentional death rate (that is, mechanisms with a larger number of deaths) for each group did. For example, motor vehicle traffic death rates were twice as high in rural areas compared to urban areas for both age groups. 

This data brief does not get into the specific reasons for disparities within specific mechanisms. However, there is a wide body of research that has associated urban-rural differences in injury mortality to a variety of factors. These include differences in types of activities undertaken by children living in rural and urban areas and the built environments that they undertake these activities in. Studies have also suggested that differences in patterns of safety equipment use and the practice of safety-related behaviors may play a role in differing mortality rates. Access to care has also been pointed to as an issue, when considering first responder response times in rural settings compared to urban settings, and access to medical facilities, including high level trauma care. The introduction to the report cites several of these studies.

Additional information on unintentional injuries, and strategies to address unintentional injuries are available from the CDC’s National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.

QuickStats: Age-Adjusted Rates of Firearm-Related Homicide by Race, Hispanic Origin, and Sex — National Vital Statistics System, United States, 2019

October 22, 2021


In 2019, among males, non-Hispanic Black males had the highest age-adjusted rate of firearm-related homicide at 34.9 per 100,000 population and non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander males had the lowest rate (1.6).

Among females, non-Hispanic Black females had the highest rate (4.1) and non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander females had the lowest rate (0.5).

Males had higher rates than females across all race and Hispanic origin groups.

Source: National Vital Statistics System, Mortality Data, 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/deaths.htm


NCHS Releases Two New Reports on Mental Health Among U.S. Adults during Pandemic

October 20, 2021

1 out of 5 U.S. adults (20.3%) received mental health treatment in the past 12 months, including 16.5% who had taken prescription medication for their mental health and 10.1% who received counseling or therapy by a mental health professional in 2020.

The data is featured in a new report, “Mental Health Treatment Among Adults: United States, 2020,” showing women were more likely than men to have received any mental health treatment. Non-Hispanic White adults (24.4%) were more likely than non-Hispanic Black (15.3%), Hispanic (12.6%), and non-Hispanic Asian (7.7%) adults to have received any mental health treatment.

As the level of urbanization decreased, the percentage of adults who had taken medication for their mental health increased, and the percentage who had received counseling or therapy decreased.

A second report, “Perceived Social and Emotional Support Among Adults: United States, July–December 2020,” released today found that more than 3 out of 4 U.S. adults (77.5%) reported receiving the social and emotional support they need during the second half of 2020.

Social and emotional support was lower among Hispanic (70.9%), non-Hispanic black (71.6%), and non-Hispanic Asian (71.3%) adults compared with non-Hispanic white adults (81.2%). The percentage of adults who always or usually received the social and emotional support they need was higher among adults who were married or living with a partner compared with adults not in those relationships.

Social and emotional support increased as educational attainment and family income increased.  A greater percentage of adults without disability (78.6%) received the social and emotional support they need compared with adults with disability (65.5%).

QuickStats: Age-Adjusted Rates of Firearm-Related Suicide, by Race, Hispanic Origin, and Sex — National Vital Statistics System, United States, 2019

October 15, 2021


In 2019, among males, non-Hispanic White males had the highest age-adjusted rate of firearm-related suicide at 15.8 per 100,000 population, followed by non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaskan Native males (11.2), non-Hispanic Black males (6.9), Hispanic males (4.6), and non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander males (3.2).

Among females, non-Hispanic White and non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaskan Native females had the highest rates (2.6 and 2.2, respectively), followed by non-Hispanic Black females (0.8), Hispanic females (0.6), and non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander females (0.4).

Males had higher rates than females across all race and Hispanic origin groups.

Source: National Vital Statistics System, Mortality Data, 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/deaths.htm


Monthly Provisional Drug Overdose Counts through March 2021

October 13, 2021


NCHS has released the next set of monthly provisional drug overdose death counts.  The monthly counts are released under the Vital Statistics Rapid Release program as an interactive data visualization.


  • Provisional data show that the predicted number of drug overdose deaths in the United States showed an increase of 30.8% from the 12 months ending in March 2020 to the 12 months ending in March 2021, from 75,798 to 99,106.
  • The predicted number of opioid-involved drug overdose deaths in the United States for the 12-month period ending in March 2021 (74,724) increased from 54,017 in the previous year.

QuickStats: Percentage of Women Aged 25–44 Years Who Had Ever Used Infertility Services, by Type of Service — National Survey of Family Growth, United States, 2006–2010 and 2015–2019

October 8, 2021


During 2015–2019, among women aged 25–44 years, 14.3% had ever used any infertility services, down from 16.8% during 2006–2010.

The percentage who had ever used medical help to get pregnant declined from 12.5% during 2006–2010 to 10.5% during 2015–2019, but the difference in the percentage ever using medical help to prevent pregnancy loss (6.8% during 2006–2010 and 5.8% during 2015–2019) was not statistically significant.

During both periods, a higher percentage had ever received medical help to get pregnant than had ever received medical help to prevent pregnancy loss.

Source: National Survey of Family Growth, 2006–2010 and 2015–2019. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg/index.htm


PODCAST: The Record Increase in Homicide During 2020

October 8, 2021


HOST: When analyzing trends among leading cause of death (as well as other health measures), it’s important to note that a statistically significant change from year-to-year, whether it be a percent increase or a percent decrease, usually ranges somewhere in the single digits.  So, for example in 2019, death rates from Septicemia dropped nearly 7 percent from 2018, making it the second biggest decline among all leading causes of death.

Occasionally, the one-year change will hit the low double digits.  Death rates from influenza and pneumonia fell 17 percent in 2019, the result of a mild flu season in comparison with a severe flu season the year before.  A double-digit change really stands out as significant when analyzing trends from year to year.

This is why the 30 percent increase in the U.S. homicide rate during 2020 is so remarkable.  The increase itself was not unexpected – after all, the FBI’s Uniform Crime Report had documented a similar increase just days before NCHS released its provisional quarterly estimates on October 6.  But the 30 percent jump in homicide in 2020 was the biggest one-year increase in over a century, with the lone bigger increase coming way back in 1905, essentially a statistical blip that was likely the result of changes to the national death registry at a time when the National Vital Statistics System was first being constructed.

Prior to 2020, the biggest increase in the national homicide rate came in 2001, the year of the September 11 attacks, when the rate increased 20 percent.

Joining us today to discuss this somewhat stunning increase, is Robert Anderson, Chief of the NCHS Mortality Statistics Branch.

Dr. Anderson, thanks for joining us.  When you first saw the number – the 30 percent increase in homicide – what was your reaction?

ROBERT ANDERSON: Well it was it was a pretty big surprise overall.  Now, not as big a surprise it might have been – as you know the FBI had recently released information that suggested nearly a 30% increase, so from that perspective we expected that the increase would be large but 30% is still sort of huge increase in terms of mortality.

HOST:  In terms of statistical history, how does this one-year change historically with other one-year changes, either major increases or major declines, in leading causes of death?

ROBERT ANDERSON:  Well for homicide we did see a pretty substantial increase in 2001 and of course that was directly due to 9/11, to the terrorist attacks that year.  Generally, we don’t see large increases like this for mortality.  You have to go back to when infectious diseases were really prevalent to see large increases for causes of death. I mean, in terms of homicide prior to 2001 you had to go all the way back to the early 1900s – 1904 to 1905 – to find a larger increase than what we saw from 2019 to 2020.  Although that’s likely, at least partly, artifactual due to increases in reporting in the number of states reporting and there’s some other things going on as well at that time that could explain the increase, but mainly it’s an artifact of reporting.

HOST:  So then that 1905 increase – is that even comparable to what we’ve seen here in 2020?

ROBERT ANDERSON:  Not really.  At the time there were maybe 20 states reporting and the number of states reporting was increasing at that time.  Not only the number of states but also the completeness of reporting was increasing in the states that were already reporting as well.  We didn’t have all states reporting in the United States with regard to vital statistics until 1933.  So anything prior to 1933 we would be missing some records and ideally the rate would be sort of reasonably representative for the United States but we know that some of the states coming on board at that time had higher homicide rates overall than the states that were already in the system.

HOST:  So while the increase in 2020 was probably the largest in history the actual rate itself – the number of homicides per 100,000 – is lower than at other points in history more recently.  Could you expand on this?  What period was the peak homicide rate in the country?

ROBERT ANDERSON:  Sure.  So the homicide rate that we’re seeing for 2020 is about 7.8 per 100,000 and it’s a big increase from 6 per 100,000 and 2019 but if you go back to the early 80s and actually in the 70s, you had rates of higher than 10 per 100,000, so at those times you had a higher homicide rate.  Not the big increases or big decreases at that time but the overall level was much higher.

HOST: Death certificate data don’t provide any details about societal issues that may have contributed to the increase, so there’s no way to look at the role the pandemic played in this, if any, correct?

ROBERT ANDERSON:  Yeah that’s essentially correct. With the death certificate data, you really would need to bring in more information.  And I know that there are folks currently looking at this issue to try to understand better the role of the pandemic in this increase, but with death certificate data solely then we really can’t make those determinations.  You really have to look at other patterns and there certainly seems to be a correlation between the two but as we know correlation is not causation.  It’s going to require some I think fairly intensive research to try to sort it all out.

HOST:  In the past, there have been some other studies that have drawn a link between economic downturns and increases in homicide.  What can you tell us about that?

ROBERT ANDERSON: Well there certainly has been some research and the argument is that when economic times get tough, people – crime rises and along with property crime rises, violent crime as well. The correlation though between economic downturns and increases homicide isn’t a perfect one – the correlation is actually fairly weak. It seems to be more correlated with activities that tend to foster violence.  So you saw fairly large increases during prohibition. In the mid 70’s and early 80’s you had big increases and in the drug trade so I think that the connection is more with illegal activity in general rather than economic downturns per se although that does seem to definitely have an impact.

HOST:  And to reiterate, nothing like that on the death certificate?

ROBERT ANDERSON:  No.  The research, they’re looking at patterns using multiple data sets so they can use the final statistics datasets to look at homicides, but they are also using economic data and other sort of social data to model increases and decreases.

HOST:  Could you talk a little bit about the differences between the data released by NCHS and the data in the Uniform Crime Report released by the FBI recently?

ROBERT ANDERSON:  Sure.  So the FBI data is a system where the FBI asks law enforcement agencies across the country to report certain types of information.  Homicides are part of that.  It’s a voluntary system, not all law enforcement agencies report.  The vital statistics data, of course, is coming from the death certificate.  Death certificates have to be filed for every death that occurs in the United States, so vital statistics data are more complete than the data that come out in the Uniform Crime Report.  That said, the trends match pretty closely between the UCR and the vital statistics data so you know when we see something come out in the UCR – like a big increase like we saw with homicide, – there’s a good bet that the vital statistics data will show that as well.  And that’s indeed what we’ve seen.

HOST: Do you expect these provisional numbers to hold up when the 2020 are finalized in the next couple months?

ROBERT ANDERSON:  Yeah the data are complete enough at this point that we’re confident that there won’t be any significant changes between now and when we release the final data.  So the numbers will be pretty close – they are pretty close to final now.

HOST: Is it too early to get a sense of whether this increase in homicide has continued into 2021?

ROBERT ANDERSON:  Yeah it really is because homicides typically require a death investigation.  Information on the cause of death comes to us later than is typical for deaths.  Generally, we get the fact of death and the cause of death in a reasonably timely fashion, within a few weeks at most of the date of death, but with homicides – and this is true for suicides as well and for drug overdoses generally, since an in-depth investigation has to be done and the cause of death may not come till months later and some jurisdictions may take six months for things like toxicology to be complete and the full investigation to be done.  So there’s necessarily a greater lag for causes such as homicides and suicides and drug overdoses, and things like that – deaths that require a lengthy death investigation. And so at this point we have data through the end of 2020 and those data are reasonably complete, but the data for 2021 are really not very complete at this point. We will be releasing some information for 2021 in the coming months but we just don’t have a sense yet for whether homicides are continuing to rise in 2021.

HOST:  Any other things you’d like to add?

ROBERT ANDERSON:  Well I think it is interesting that we’ve seen this large increase in homicides, large increase in drug overdose deaths, and that those seem to be correlated with this big increase in COVID-19 – of course, well COVID-19 was going from zero to 700,000 deaths.  I think for 2020 it’s you know about 350,000 or 370,000,000.  But this is sort of a strange time, I guess, from the standpoint of mortality statistics, I mean, this is just not the sort of thing that we typically see.  We’re usually talking about relatively small increases in mortality or small decreases in mortality.  We don’t normally see these big jumps.  As we go and as we calculate the official mortality statistics for 2020, we’re going to have a lot more work than we normally have to describe what’s going on.  We’re going to need to spend some significant time on these conditions, and these diseases that have increased so much during the pandemic.

HOST:  Strange days.


HOST:  Thanks very much, Dr. Anderson.

ROBERT ANDERSON:  Alright – thank you.

HOST: The new data on homicide show there was a wide difference in the 2020 rates based on geography.  The states with the highest homicide rates were:  Mississippi, Louisiana, Alabama, Missouri, Arkansas, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Maryland.  The District of Columbia had a higher homicide rate  than any state.  The states with the biggest rate increase in 2020 were Montana, South Dakota, Delaware and Kentucky, while only two states, Alaska and Maine, had definitive declines in homicide rates.

Homicide is one of 21 leading causes of death that are included in the quarterly provisional data release that posted this week.  The new numbers are featured on a data visualization dashboard on the NCHS web site.  Some of the significant findings include:

  • A nearly 17% increase from 2019 to 2020 in death rates from accidents or unintentional injuries.
  • Death rates from Diabetes also increased nearly 17%, from the one year period ending in March 2020 to the same point in 2021.
  • Hypertension mortality increased nearly 16% in the one-year period ending in Quarter 1 2021.
  • And death rates from Influenza/Pneumonia dropped 17% during this period.

In other news, this week NCHS also released a report on mortality and marital status in the United States.  The report focused on adults age 25 and up, covering the period 2010 though 2019.  The study found that death rates for married adults during roughly the last decade  have declined by more than three times that of never-married or divorced adults.  Suicide was found to be among the ten leading causes of death for never-married and divorced people, but not among the leading killers for married or widowed people.  Cancer is the number one cause of death for married adults whereas heart disease is the leading killer for unmarried adults.

There are a number of other data releases in the queue for NCHS this month as well.  The National Health Interview Survey is releasing two new reports on October 20th, on mental health treatment among adults and social and emotional support among adults.  Both reports feature data from 2020.

In the area of vital statistics, the latest quarterly provisional estimates on infant mortality, featuring data through 2020, will be released on October 14.  The day before that, the NCHS vital statistics team will release the lastest monthly estimates on drug overdose deaths in the U.S., though March of 2021.  Later in the month, on October 26, there will be a study on 2019 data on fetal mortality  in the United States.  And the following day there will be the latest in the series of rural-urban health studies, this one focusing on rural-urban differences in death rates from unintentional injuries among children.

Also, two methodological studies from the National Health Care Survey will be released on October 18, one focusing on “enhancing identification of opioid-related health outcomes,” and another on “machine learning for medical coding.”

Finally, October is dedicated to several health observances, including Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Awareness.  SIDS is the 4th leading cause of infant death in the United States, according to the latest final data from NCHS.

October is also Breast Cancer Awareness Month.  Over 42,000 women died from breast cancer in the United States in 2019, according to the latest NCHS data.

Join us next month for another NCHS “Statcast,” which will include new studies on suicide by month and demographic characteristics for 2020, as well as a study on mortality among the American Indian/Alaskan Native population.

The Record Increase in Homicide Rates in the United States From 2019 to 2020

October 6, 2021

It’s not unusual to see increases and decreases from year to year in the leading causes of deaths in the United States.  Most often, the changes appear small – usually under 10 percent – and only  occasionally do the changes reach double figures. 

That’s why the 30 percent increase in the national homicide rate from 2019 and 2020 is so remarkable.  These new data were released on October 6 as part of NCHS’s quarterly release of provisional mortality data for the United States. 

The increase itself was not unexpected – the FBI’s Uniform Crime Report had documented a similar increase just days before.  However, the 30 percent jump in homicide rates in 2020 was the biggest one-year increase in over a century.  The only larger increase occurred back in 1905, and experts view that as a statistical blip.  It was likely the result of several states with high homicide rates being added to the death registry as the National Vital Statistics System was first being built.  In modern history, the previous record increase for homicide was in 2001, when rates increased 20 percent, largely due to the September 11 attacks. 

The numbers for 2020 are striking:  the homicide rate rose from 6.0 homicides per 100,000 in 2019 to 7.8 in 2020.  And the 2020 rate is the highest in the U.S. since 1995.  Still, the 2020 rate was lower than the rate in the early 1980s of more than 10 homicides per 100,000.

Of course, most people want to know the reasons behind the big increase – a question on the minds of many public health and justice professionals.  However, NCHS mortality data come from death certificates, which don’t provide the context needed to answer these questions.  Still, 2020 was obviously an unusual and turbulent year.  There was the arrival of the pandemic, triggering economic turmoil and reports of emotional despair, as well as protests in many U.S. cities, some of which turned violent.  Even before this unusual year, data showed the homicide rate had been, for the most part, inching up in recent years.


SOURCE: National Vital Statistics System, CDC WONDER

While the FBI’s Uniform Crime Report can provide some of the context behind the rise in homicide, NCHS will also release additional data in the coming weeks that provide a more complete picture.  Future updates will include demographic details about the victims and information about the methods used in these homicides.  Already, the 2020 provisional data show a 14 percent increase in death rates from all firearm injuries, including homicide.  But that increase accounts for less than half the increase observed for homicide.  Of note, the provisional data also show a slight decline in the suicide rate in 2020.  That decline is likely not enough to offset a (potentially) large increase in firearm-related homicides. 

While homicide rates increased in nearly every state, there was a wide difference in the 2020 rates based on geography. 

States with the highest homicide rates: 

  • Mississippi
  • Louisiana
  • Alabama
  • Missouri
  • Arkansas
  • South Carolina
  • Tennessee
  • Maryland. 

The District of Columbia had a higher homicide rate (24.4 homicides per 100,000) than any state. 

States with the biggest rate increase in 2020:

  • Montana (+83.8)
  • South Dakota (+80.6)
  • Delaware (+62.3)
  • Kentucky (+61.0)

Only two states, Alaska and Maine, had declines in homicide rates (-32.4 and -11.1 respectively).

Homicide is one of 21 leading causes of death included in the quarterly provisional data release.  These estimates are featured in a data visualization dashboard on the NCHS web site.  Some of the significant findings on death rates from other causes of death in the most recent quarter of data include:

  • Unintentional injuries – A nearly 17% increase from 2019 to 2020.
  • Influenza/Pneumonia – A 17% decline from April 2019-March 2020 to April 2020-March 2021.
  • Diabetes – A nearly 17% increase from April 2019-March 2020 to April 2020-March 2021.
  • Hypertension – A nearly 16% increase from April 2019-March 2020 to April 2020-March 2021.

The data visualization dashboard is available at:  https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/mortality-dashboard.htm#

Fact or Fiction – Homicide Rates

October 6, 2021

Source: National Vital Statistics System