US Prepares for Climate Migration with “Receiving Cities” Program

A Satellite View of North America Highlighting Regions Potentially Affected by Climate Migration

The United States is gearing up for an unprecedented wave of domestic migration as extreme weather, rising sea levels, and natural disasters drive Americans to seek refuge in geographically resilient regions.

According to a New America study, up to 20 million people could relocate to safer areas like the Midwest, Northeast, and Northern Great Plains by 2100.

Factor Projected Impact
Americans relocating by 2100 20 million
Already relocated due to floods 3.2 million
Target regions for migration Midwest, Northeast, Great Plains

The federal government is stepping up with a Receiving Cities Housing Program, aiming to bolster cities like Detroit, Duluth, Buffalo, and Cincinnati.

These post-industrial hubs have the capacity to welcome new residents but currently face critical challenges like housing shortages and underfunded infrastructure.

The Sun Belt Exodus

For the past 50 years, states in the Sun Beltโ€”such as Florida, Texas, and Arizonaโ€”have drawn millions of new residents seeking affordable housing, low taxes, and warm weather.

This migration fueled local economies, creating jobs and boosting housing markets.

However, the tide is shifting as extreme heat, flooding, wildfires, and sea-level rise make these areas less livable.

A Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco study reveals a growing trend of people moving away from areas exposed to extreme heat and toward cooler regions.

Yet many who leave high-risk areas end up settling in equally vulnerable nearby locations.

First Street Foundation reports that 3.2 million people have already relocated due to flood risks.

Meanwhile, others continue to move to the Sun Belt, unaware of the long-term risks.

Climate Threats Regions Most Affected
Extreme heat Sun Belt (Florida, Texas, Arizona)
Flooding and sea-level rise Coastal cities (East & Gulf Coasts)
Wildfires Western states

This decision to remain or settle in at-risk areas has severe economic consequences.

Local and state governments risk financial losses from property damage, reduced tax revenue, and market collapses in real estate and insurance.

Federal disaster relief programs, such as the National Flood Insurance Program, are already struggling to remain solvent under the weight of increasing payouts.

Challenges for Receiving Cities


Regions in the Midwest, Northeast, and northern Great Plains, often referred to as Receiving Cities, represent potential hubs for population inflows.

Cities like Detroit, Duluth, Buffalo, and Cincinnati are well-positioned geographically to handle climate-driven migration.

Historically, these cities have seen population declines due to deindustrialization and economic disinvestment, leaving them with latent urban capacity for growth.

However, these cities face significant barriers to absorbing new residents. Many suffer from housing shortages, underfunded infrastructure, and strained public services.

For instance, a 2020 University of Michigan study found that Detroit, despite its many vacant properties, lacked 24,000 habitable homes.

Similarly, Duluth needs 2,400 additional housing units just to meet current demand, according to a 2022 report.

Housing Shortfalls in Key Receiving Cities

City Housing Shortage
Detroit 24,000 habitable homes
Duluth 2,400 housing units
Buffalo Thousands of units (estimated)
Cincinnati Significant shortfall

Without adequate planning, the arrival of climate migrants could overwhelm housing markets, drive up costs, and displace existing residents.

Cities like Chico, California, experienced a 21% spike in housing prices following population growth from the 2018 Camp Fire.

Smaller cities, often lacking resources, are especially vulnerable to such disruptions.

Federal Action Plan


The new administrationโ€™s Receiving Cities Housing Program is designed to proactively address these challenges, ensuring that designated cities are ready to welcome new residents.

The program will focus on housing production, preservation, and providing financial incentives for voluntary relocation.

1. Research and Designation of Receiving Cities

To guide this effort, the government will expand research on climate resilience, migration trends, and urban carrying capacity.

Agencies like FEMA, HUD, and the U.S. Census Bureau will analyze data to identify cities best suited to handle population inflows.

These cities must demonstrate a commitment to affordable housing development, resilient urban planning, and socioeconomic equity.

2. Housing Production and Preservation

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by City of Tulsa (@cityoftulsa)

The program will include two key components:

  • New Homes Program: Federal funding and technical support will help cities build affordable housing. Programs like HUDโ€™s HOME funds and FEMAโ€™s Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities initiative will prioritize Receiving Cities.
  • Home Restoration Program: This initiative will focus on rehabilitating vacant and older homes to make them market-ready. HUDโ€™s FHA 203(k) program and local financing options will play a central role.

Key Federal Housing Programs

Program Name Purpose Lead Agencies
Receiving Cities Housing Program Expand affordable housing production HUD, FEMA, DOT
New Homes Program Support new affordable housing units HUD, local governments
Home Restoration Program Rehabilitate older, vacant properties HUD, private developers

3. Financial Incentives for Migrants

The administration will pilot a relocation program offering tax breaks, housing vouchers, and training opportunities for Americans moving from high-risk areas.

This builds on successful models like Tulsa Remote, which attracts professionals with relocation incentives and could serve as a template for climate migration efforts.

Framing Climate Migration as an Opportunity

A Map Showing U.S. Cities, Including Austin, Dallas, New Orleans, Atlanta, and Orlando, Marked as Potential Hubs for Climate Migration Planning
Source: Youtube/Screenshot, Inflows revitalize cities by boosting economies and filling jobs

The administration will frame weather-related migration as a manageable risk, akin to cybersecurity or national security challenges.

By positioning relocation as an economic and social opportunity, the government hopes to foster bipartisan backing.

Population inflows can revitalize struggling cities by boosting local economies, filling labor gaps, and increasing tax bases.

Long-term planning and strategic investments will ensure that both new and existing residents enjoy equitable access to resources and opportunities.

Conclusion

By prioritizing the preparation of Receiving Cities and facilitating voluntary relocation, the U.S. can turn climate migration into a catalyst for revitalization.

The federal governmentโ€™s comprehensive approach ensures equitable, sustainable growth for both newcomers and long-time residents, setting a new precedent for managing climate-driven migration.