Population Decline in the US by State – Latest 2026 Census Data Shows Five States Shrinking

Population decline in the United States appears at the state level, while the national count still grew. The country reached 341,784,857 residents on July 1, 2025, according to the U.S. Census Bureau Vintage 2025 state population estimates.

That was an increase of 1,781,060 people from the previous year, or about 0.5 percent. The slower pace carries more weight than the topline growth number alone.

The Census Bureau January 2026 release shows that net international migration fell from 2.7 million to 1.3 million in the year ending June 30, 2025. Births still exceeded deaths nationally, yet natural increase remained far weaker than in earlier decades.

At the state level, the latest release points to a narrower but sharper divide. Forty-five states gained population from July 2024 to July 2025. Five states lost residents: California, Hawaii, New Mexico, Vermont, and West Virginia. Puerto Rico also declined and should be treated separately from the 50-state count.

Latest Insights


The latest official state dataset available in 2026 comes from Census Vintage 2025. It measures resident population totals and components of change from April 1, 2020, to July 1, 2025.

State population estimates for July 2026 have yet to be released, so the freshest official state-level figures are the 2025 estimates published in January 2026.

Main finding: The United States continued to grow in 2025, but growth slowed sharply. Population decline remained concentrated in a small group of states where domestic outmigration, natural decrease, or both outweighed population gains from births and international migration.

Measure Latest Figure What It Shows
U.S. population, July 1, 2025 341,784,857 The national population still increased
U.S. growth, 2024 to 2025 +1,781,060 Slowest growth since the early pandemic period
U.S. growth rate, 2024 to 2025 +0.5% Growth slowed from 1.0% the previous year
Net international migration, 2025 +1,262,202 Major slowdown from 2024
Natural change, 2025 +518,858 Births still exceeded deaths nationally
States with population decline 5 California, Hawaii, New Mexico, Vermont, West Virginia

States That Lost Population

The population decline in 2025 was limited to five states. The reasons differed by state. California and Hawaii were pulled down mainly by domestic outmigration. Vermont, New Mexico and West Virginia showed the effect of natural decrease, where deaths exceeded births.

State 2025 Population Change From 2024 Percent Change Main Driver
California 39,355,309 -9,465 -0.02% Large domestic outmigration outweighed natural increase and international migration
Hawaii 1,432,820 -2,132 -0.15% Domestic outmigration outweighed gains from births and international migration
Vermont 644,663 -1,858 -0.29% Deaths exceeded births, with additional domestic outmigration
New Mexico 2,125,498 -1,276 -0.06% Deaths exceeded births, and more people left for other states than arrived
West Virginia 1,766,147 -1,255 -0.07% Natural decrease outweighed domestic migration gains

Largest State Declines

Bar chart showing California with the largest state population loss in 2025, followed by Hawaii, Vermont, New Mexico, and West Virginia
State population losses from July 2024 to July 2025, based on Census Vintage 2025 estimates

Why States Lose Population

The Census Bureau measures population changes through births, deaths, domestic migration, and international migration. The Vintage 2025 methodology statement describes the basic formula: population base, plus births, minus deaths, plus migration, equals the population estimate.

Natural Decrease

Natural decrease happens when deaths outnumber births. In 2025, 17 states had negative natural change: Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Kentucky, Maine, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, and West Virginia.

Natural decrease plays a central role in places with older age structures. West Virginia offers the clearest example among the states that declined. The state gained 6,408 people from domestic migration in 2025, but deaths exceeded births by 7,887. That was enough to push the total population lower.

Domestic Outmigration

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by U.S. Census Bureau (@uscensusbureau)

Domestic migration measures movement between U.S. states. In 2025, 20 states and the District of Columbia had negative domestic migration. California had the largest domestic loss at -229,077. New York followed at -137,586. Illinois, New Jersey, and Massachusetts also recorded large domestic migration losses.

Domestic migration helps explain why California declined, even with a natural increase of 109,715 and net international migration of 109,278. Those gains were nearly offset by the domestic outmigration of -229,077.

International Migration Slowdown

International migration remained positive for every state in 2025, but the size of the gain fell nationwide. The Census Bureau reported that net international migration dropped by 53.8 percent from the previous year.

The agency also projected that, if current patterns continue, net international migration could fall to about 321,000 by July 2026.

That shift changes the population outlook for states that had relied on international migration to offset domestic outmigration or natural decrease. New York, California, Illinois, New Jersey, and Massachusetts still received large international migration gains, yet several of those states remained close to flat growth or below their 2020 base.

Historical Context

State population decline has a long history, but the geography has changed. The Census historical population change table shows that the U.S. grew 7.4 percent from 2010 to 2020, the second-slowest decennial growth rate in U.S. history after the 1930s.

From 2010 to 2020, only three states lost population: Illinois, Mississippi, and West Virginia. Puerto Rico also recorded a steep decline over that decade.

In the 2020 to 2025 estimate period, seven states remained below their 2020 population base: California, Hawaii, Illinois, Louisiana, Mississippi, New York, and West Virginia.

Place 2010 Census 2020 Census 2010 To 2020 Change Percent Change
Illinois 12,830,632 12,812,508 -18,124 -0.1%
Mississippi 2,967,297 2,961,279 -6,018 -0.2%
West Virginia 1,852,994 1,793,716 -59,278 -3.2%
Puerto Rico 3,725,789 3,285,874 -439,915 -11.8%

Longer Historical Pattern

West Virginia stands out because decline has appeared in more than one decade. Census historical data show population losses from 1950 to 1960, 1960 to 1970, 1980 to 1990, and 2010 to 2020. The latest 2025 estimate keeps the state below its 2020 base.

The broader national story changed after 2020. Population growth returned from the unusually weak pandemic period, yet the gain now depends heavily on migration. When international migration slows and births remain low relative to earlier decades, more states sit closer to the line between growth and decline.

State-by-State Population Change And Migration Data

The table below includes all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. The 2020 to 2025 percentage uses the Census Vintage 2025 estimate base, so it should be treated as an estimate series comparison rather than a decennial census comparison.

State Or Area 2025 Population 2024 To 2025 Change 2024 To 2025 % 2020 To 2025 % Natural Change 2025 Domestic Migration 2025 International Migration 2025
Alabama 5,193,088 +30,033 +0.58% +3.34% -2,188 +23,358 +8,946
Alaska 737,270 +733 +0.10% +0.53% +3,308 -4,525 +1,959
Arizona 7,623,818 +67,394 +0.89% +6.51% +7,649 +31,107 +28,219
Arkansas 3,114,791 +18,711 +0.60% +3.43% -1,224 +14,475 +5,470
California 39,355,309 -9,465 -0.02% -0.51% +109,715 -229,077 +109,278
Colorado 6,012,561 +24,059 +0.40% +4.11% +20,608 -12,100 +15,356
Connecticut 3,688,496 +14,047 +0.38% +2.24% +2,283 -5,945 +17,534
Delaware 1,059,952 +9,829 +0.94% +7.07% -554 +6,855 +3,473
District of Columbia 693,645 +2,335 +0.34% +0.59% +2,516 -4,128 +3,915
Florida 23,462,518 +196,680 +0.85% +8.93% -1,333 +22,517 +178,674
Georgia 11,302,748 +98,540 +0.88% +5.50% +28,631 +27,333 +42,579
Hawaii 1,432,820 -2,132 -0.15% -1.54% +2,024 -8,876 +4,768
Idaho 2,029,733 +28,861 +1.44% +10.36% +6,900 +19,915 +2,148
Illinois 12,719,141 +16,108 +0.13% -0.80% +10,903 -40,017 +44,752
Indiana 6,973,333 +38,579 +0.56% +2.75% +8,561 +12,197 +17,852
Iowa 3,238,387 +7,933 +0.25% +1.50% +2,949 -970 +5,903
Kansas 2,977,220 +11,968 +0.40% +1.34% +4,951 -519 +7,440
Kentucky 4,606,864 +22,818 +0.50% +2.23% -83 +7,269 +15,709
Louisiana 4,618,189 +3,311 +0.07% -0.85% +2,774 -14,387 +14,900
Maine 1,414,874 +6,436 +0.46% +3.79% -5,019 +7,406 +4,040
Maryland 6,265,347 +20,033 +0.32% +1.35% +11,444 -12,127 +20,503
Massachusetts 7,154,084 +15,524 +0.22% +1.72% +8,419 -33,340 +40,240
Michigan 10,127,884 +27,922 +0.28% +0.48% -4,998 +1,796 +30,706
Minnesota 5,830,405 +33,000 +0.57% +2.17% +12,071 +8,300 +12,486
Mississippi 2,954,160 +3,988 +0.14% -0.24% -2,607 -917 +7,451
Missouri 6,270,541 +26,997 +0.43% +1.88% +177 +14,028 +12,665
Montana 1,144,694 +7,137 +0.63% +5.58% -90 +6,348 +899
Nebraska 2,018,006 +12,415 +0.62% +2.86% +6,136 -366 +6,599
Nevada 3,282,188 +28,645 +0.88% +5.69% +3,051 +14,914 +10,551
New Hampshire 1,415,342 +6,824 +0.48% +2.74% -2,167 +6,554 +2,403
New Jersey 9,548,215 +41,861 +0.44% +2.79% +26,023 -37,428 +53,064
New Mexico 2,125,498 -1,276 -0.06% +0.38% -1,885 -2,267 +2,879
New York 20,002,427 +1,008 +0.01% -1.00% +42,815 -137,586 +95,634
North Carolina 11,197,968 +145,907 +1.32% +7.25% +15,129 +84,064 +46,890
North Dakota 799,358 +5,971 +0.75% +2.60% +2,630 +512 +2,810
Ohio 11,900,510 +39,889 +0.34% +0.86% -729 +11,926 +28,505
Oklahoma 4,123,288 +25,530 +0.62% +4.14% +2,559 +14,492 +8,420
Oregon 4,273,586 +8,262 +0.19% +0.86% -3,764 +2,228 +9,636
Pennsylvania 13,059,432 +13,584 +0.10% +0.44% -10,708 -2,936 +26,921
Puerto Rico 3,184,835 -17,686 -0.55% -3.07% -14,907 +0 -2,779
Rhode Island 1,114,521 +4,106 +0.37% +1.56% -304 -1,551 +5,923
South Carolina 5,570,274 +79,958 +1.46% +8.83% +564 +66,622 +12,930
South Dakota 935,094 +7,984 +0.86% +5.46% +2,605 +2,169 +3,183
Tennessee 7,315,076 +63,785 +0.88% +5.83% +3,597 +42,389 +17,990
Texas 31,709,821 +391,243 +1.25% +8.78% +157,711 +67,299 +167,475
Utah 3,538,904 +35,921 +1.03% +8.17% +24,961 +3,343 +7,501
Vermont 644,663 -1,858 -0.29% +0.25% -1,769 -726 +623
Virginia 8,880,107 +60,465 +0.69% +2.88% +13,817 +6,268 +40,436
Washington 8,001,020 +73,062 +0.92% +3.81% +17,230 +9,238 +46,202
West Virginia 1,766,147 -1,255 -0.07% -1.54% -7,887 +6,408 +244
Wisconsin 5,972,787 +15,619 +0.26% +1.33% +1,161 +6,984 +7,260
Wyoming 588,753 +2,031 +0.35% +2.06% +295 +1,474 +258

State Comparisons

Fastest-Growing States By Percentage

Bar chart showing South Carolina, Idaho, North Carolina, Texas, and Utah as the fastest-growing states by percentage in 2025
South Carolina and Idaho led state population growth in 2025, with domestic migration as the main driver

Largest Numeric Growth

Rank State Population Gain 2025 Population
1 Texas +391,243 31,709,821
2 Florida +196,680 23,462,518
3 North Carolina +145,907 11,197,968
4 Georgia +98,540 11,302,748
5 South Carolina +79,958 5,570,274

Largest Domestic Migration Losses

Bar chart showing California and New York with the largest domestic migration losses in 2025
Largest state domestic migration losses in the 2025 Census estimate year

Largest Domestic Migration Gains

State Net Domestic Migration 2025 Growth Pattern
North Carolina +84,064 Led the country in domestic migration gain
Texas +67,299 Large domestic gain added to natural increase and international migration
South Carolina +66,622 Fastest state growth rate in the country
Tennessee +42,389 Growth driven mainly by domestic migration
Arizona +31,107 Domestic migration remained a major source of growth

Additional Insights

Satellite map highlighting California along the U.S. West Coast
California’s population fell because domestic outmigration erased gains from births and international migration

1. California And The Cost-Driven Migration Gap

California remains the most populous state, but its 2025 decline shows how domestic migration can overtake large gains from births and international migration.

The state gained 109,715 people through natural change and 109,278 through international migration. Domestic migration was -229,077, which pulled the total below the 2024 level.

2. West Virginia And The Pressure Of Natural Decrease

West Virginia lost 1,255 residents in the latest estimate year. That number looks small, yet the structure behind it matters for long-term planning.

The state gained residents through domestic migration, but deaths exceeded births by 7,887. That kind of natural decrease can weigh on school enrollment, local labor supply, health care demand, and tax bases.

3. New York Near Flat Growth After Years Of Losses

@livelovequeens New data shows New York City’s population shrunk by 12,000 people in 2025, reversing its post-pandemic rebound. IT’S NOT JUST THE RICH LEAVING ANYMORE It’s everyone. Middle-class families, young professionals, and working households are all part of the outflow. Why? ? Rent is still climbing (median near $3,500–$4,000+) ? Inventory is tight ? Housing supply still heavily skewed toward luxury units WHERE ARE THEY GOING? Not far. Most NYC residents are relocating to: • New Jersey • Long Island • Westchester • Florida, Texas, and the Carolinas Even with population decline… ? Rents are STILL rising ? Vacancy is STILL under 2% in many areas ?️ New supply is STILL not keeping up NYC isn’t shrinking. It’s rebalancing. And that creates opportunity for buyers who understand where demand is moving next. #NYCRealEstate #HousingMarket #RealEstateInvesting #CostOfLiving #MovingOutOfNYC ♬ VISITING – finetune

New York added only 1,008 residents from 2024 to 2025, a near-flat result for a state of about 20 million people. The state remains 201,269 below its 2020 estimate base.

Large international migration and positive natural change nearly balanced domestic outmigration, leaving only slight growth in the latest year.

4. Florida Growth Shifts From Domestic Moves To Immigration

Florida added 196,680 people from 2024 to 2025, the second-largest numeric gain behind Texas. The mix changed, however.

Florida recorded a natural decrease of -1,333 and domestic migration of +22,517, far lower than earlier pandemic-era domestic gains. Net international migration of +178,674 accounted for most of the latest annual increase.

5. Rural Decline Remains A County-Level Population Story

State totals can hide local losses. The USDA Economic Research Service reported that nonmetropolitan areas grew after 2020 because migration offset natural decrease, yet 51 percent of nonmetro counties still lost population between July 2020 and June 2024.

Rural decline remained visible in parts of West Virginia, Pennsylvania, the Dakotas, Nebraska, Kansas, Illinois, Iowa, California, the Mississippi Delta and Appalachia.

Methodology

Census population estimates are produced through a cohort-component method. The estimate starts with a base population, then adds births, subtracts deaths, and adds net migration. Domestic migration sums to zero nationally because every move between states adds to one state and subtracts from another. International migration affects the national total.

At the state level, the components of change may not add perfectly to the final population change because the Census Bureau uses residual adjustments to keep estimates consistent by geography and demographic characteristics.

Several terms matter when reading the table:

  • Natural change: births minus deaths.
  • Domestic migration: movement between U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
  • International migration: movement between the United States and other countries.
  • 2024 to 2025 change: annual population change from July 1, 2024 to July 1, 2025.
  • 2020 to 2025 change: change from the Vintage 2025 estimate base to July 1, 2025.

FAQ

Which States Lost Population In The Latest Census Estimate?
California, Hawaii, New Mexico, Vermont and West Virginia lost population from July 2024 to July 2025. Puerto Rico also declined, although it is treated separately from the 50 states in Census state comparisons.
Why Did California Lose Population?
California lost population because domestic outmigration outweighed gains from births and international migration. The state gained 109,715 people from natural change and 109,278 from international migration, but lost 229,077 through domestic migration.
Which State Had The Fastest Population Growth?
South Carolina had the fastest percentage growth from 2024 to 2025 at +1.46 percent. Domestic migration was the main driver, adding 66,622 residents.
Which State Added The Most People?
Texas added the most people from 2024 to 2025, with a gain of 391,243 residents. Texas grew through a combination of natural increase, domestic migration and international migration.
Why Can A State Decline Even When People Move In From Other States?
A state can decline when deaths exceed births by a larger amount than domestic migration gains. West Virginia gained residents from domestic migration in 2025, yet natural decrease pushed the total population lower.

Conclusion

White figures stand above a red downward arrow to show population decline
Source: shutterstock.com, U.S. growth slowed as more states moved closer to population decline

The latest 2026-released Census data shows a country still growing, but with a thinner margin. Population decline now depends less on one national story and more on the balance inside each state: births, deaths, domestic migration, and international migration.

California shows the impact of domestic outmigration in a large, high-cost state. West Virginia shows the pressure created by aging and natural decrease. New York and Illinois show how large states can remain below their 2020 base even after returning to slight annual growth.

Meanwhile, Texas, Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia continue to absorb a large share of national growth.

The next official state estimate will show whether the 2025 slowdown was a temporary adjustment or the start of a more difficult demographic period for states already close to population decline.

Sources